Special Topics Paper: Arguments for Subgenre Labeling & Genrefication
Signage from a high school library that rearranged their fiction section by genre |
Based on my work experience at a public library branch and observing other library systems, I found that not every book has a genre label, and those that do consist of overarching genres such as:
- Inspirational
- Historical
- Fantasy
- Action
- Romance
- Sci-Fi
- And “Sports” in juvenile fiction
Fantasy and sci-fi genres could especially benefit from at least subgenre labeling. If a patron wanted a Harry Potter read-alike, looking at the books with "fantasy" on the spine label hardly guarantees that it's a relevant book recommendation. MasterClass (2020) compiled a list of the 18 prominent fantasy subgenres, which includes dystopian, low fantasy, magical realism, superhero fantasy, Arthurian fantasy, and steampunk. As this reflects the current reader landscape, I believe it would be beneficial and useful for libraries to act on this data through extra labeling. During the rise of "new adult" books, Deahl (2012) shared, “While some may roll their eyes at ever-splintering genre tags, the need to use these descriptors is becoming more necessary for editors and agents” (p. 4). Also, adding extra genre and subgenre labeling offers a way to potentially increase engagement and circulation without needing to rearrange shelving.
Kristin school library in New Zealand's fantasy subgenre "dragons" section. |
Bookstores offer perfect examples of successful use of generfication, demonstrating sorting by genre helps customers locate types of stories they would enjoy. The above image features the Kristin school library in New Zealand arranging by genrefication after doing subgenre labeling, to make a fun, engaging collection.
Dumas (2005) noted a worthwhile payoff of genrefication in juvenile fiction; circulation increased and “Avid fans of the Goosebumps series have found other titles and series to read in the Horror section…Harry Potter fans have found lots of new fantasy books to read....[and] reluctant readers appear to be more comfortable browsing the smaller genre collections” (p. 21). While Wyatt & Saricks (2019) mention how “Genre is not as stable a classifying system as it once was" (p. xvi), there's still value with keeping up with trends to keep libraries relevant and progressive. Additionally, as other articles have mentioned, adding the extra genre label still makes it easy to revert back to regular Dewey fiction shelving without requiring reprinting/reapplying labels.
Dumas (2005) noted a worthwhile payoff of genrefication in juvenile fiction; circulation increased and “Avid fans of the Goosebumps series have found other titles and series to read in the Horror section…Harry Potter fans have found lots of new fantasy books to read....[and] reluctant readers appear to be more comfortable browsing the smaller genre collections” (p. 21). While Wyatt & Saricks (2019) mention how “Genre is not as stable a classifying system as it once was" (p. xvi), there's still value with keeping up with trends to keep libraries relevant and progressive. Additionally, as other articles have mentioned, adding the extra genre label still makes it easy to revert back to regular Dewey fiction shelving without requiring reprinting/reapplying labels.
Understandably, adding extra labeling and/or genrefication requires time, effort, possible catalog changes, and displayed signage explaining subgenre tags. There are excellent arguments for and against genrefication and adding subgenre labels. However, there's plenty of resources to assist libraries in implementing genrefication and/or genre and subgenre labeling to help a library decide if it's a good fit for them. From my perspective, looking at bookstores and how Dewey nonfiction sections are sorted, genrefication isn't as outlandish as I first thought.
Deahl, R., & Rosen, J. (2012). New Adult: Needless Marketing-Speak or Valued Subgenre? Publishers Weekly, 259(51), 4–6. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Dumas, E. P. (2005). Give ’em What They Want! Reorganizing Your Fiction Collection by Genre. Library Media Connection, 24(2), 20–22. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
References
Deahl, R., & Rosen, J. (2012). New Adult: Needless Marketing-Speak or Valued Subgenre? Publishers Weekly, 259(51), 4–6. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Dumas, E. P. (2005). Give ’em What They Want! Reorganizing Your Fiction Collection by Genre. Library Media Connection, 24(2), 20–22. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Sannwald, Susan. (2015). In Defense of Library Genrefication. Website/Blog. Weebly.com. Retrieved from http://genrefication.weebly.com/.
Wyatt, N. & Saricks, J. G. (2019). The Readers’ Advisory Guide to Genre Fiction (3rd edition). ALA Editions, Chicago.
I love love love this topic! I get so frustrated at work when browsing through genres because they're so complicated now. Plus, so many titles overlap genres or try to have "twists" on the genre to differentiate themselves- we're really in a post-genre world right now. We can't actually *be* post-genre, though, because then we wouldn't be able to find anything! I really like your solution to break things down a little more. That's a really good step towards helping readers find what they're actually looking for. Great post! I bet your paper's awesome!
ReplyDeleteI have never heard of this idea and think it is fantastic! I agree that it would help patrons more easily find what they are looking for. It also helps them to branch out to other authors that may have never heard of. I do think it would take some time to get the patrons acclimated to it, but it would be worthwhile in the long run.
ReplyDeleteI don't have any library work experience yet, so I'm wondering what you do when the book fits into two genres. Do you add two stickers and clutter up more of the spine? Or do you pick one and go with it and hope it doesn't bug patrons who are trying to find it in the other genre section? Thanks for letting me ask a question I've always wondered about haha!
ReplyDeleteI was wondering the same thing. My library has been using fewer and fewer labels, and recently reintegrated children's mysteries and sci-fi/fantasy back in with general fiction to make room for a special section of graphic novels, which are frequently requested. But now the mystery readers are frustrated. With so many books falling into more than one genre, maybe the best solution would be a more user-friendly cataloging system that allowed each book to be looked up under as many genres as necessary. Or maybe a QR code on the spine of each book that lists all of its relevant genres -- although this would discriminate against patrons without smart phones.
DeleteI work at 2 different libraries and it's interesting to see how they differ in this area. One has separate sections for Mystery and Science Fiction, but the rest of the books just go into normal Fiction and I don't believe they have stickers. At my other library, we have a separate Mystery section, but some authors like James Patterson has books in both regular Fiction and Mystery which can get kind of confusing for patrons. They also use labels for books like Fantasy, Science Fiction, and Romance. The rest do not get labels at both libraries which I find interesting. I feel like the fact that only some get special labels isn't really fair, and I like the point you made that genres are so expansive that a Harry Potter fan definitely won't like every other Fantasy book. This is part of the reason why displays and reader's advisory services are helpful, but I agree that we should do everything in our power to categorize books correctly in the catalog and add labels to help reader's find what they're looking for more easily.
ReplyDeletecomments noted - the paper's grade can be found on canvas
ReplyDelete